Tuesday, October 13, 2009

The Artful Dodger: Vin Scully


That Artful Dodgers Voice -- A great story by a writer for the
By
MARK YOST
Los Angeles


The Major League Baseball playoffs begin tonight, and with them will come justifiable criticism of some of the abysmal sports commentary that regularly trudges across the airwaves. For a refreshing change, I would direct listeners to the smooth tenor voice and pithy commentary of Vin Scully. This is Mr. Scully's 60th year in the Los Angeles Dodgers broadcast booth, and he is nothing short of the best play-by-play man working in sports today.


The pregame banter for the first of three recent Rockies-Dodgers games was filled with information you could have gleaned from the morning paper or a blog. The Dodgers needed just one win to clinch the National League West (which they did Saturday night); a Phillies loss helped the Dodgers secure the best record in the National League. When Mr. Scully finally took the mike, he distinguished himself in just one sentence.


"It's a very pleasant Friday night here in Los Angeles," he said, telling radio listeners from Petaluma to Panama City something they couldn't possibly have known unless they were here at the game. More important, Mr. Scully, who's 81, wasn't just setting the atmosphere but building a rapport with his audience. "I don't announce," he told me in an interview before Saturday's game. "I have a conversation."


But once the game starts, Mr. Scully is all business. From the first pitch, you need the skills of a court stenographer to keep up with the facts and figures—all interesting and relevant—that he weaves effortlessly into a dialogue that's nothing short of poetic.


For instance, he noted that the Colorado Rockies had been 15½ games back in June and red hot coming into this series. He then reminded listeners that the Rockies were batting a paltry .168 against left-handed pitchers, like Dodgers starter Randy Wolf. Those aren't off-the-cuff remarks, but indicative of the preparation Mr. Scully puts into every broadcast.


Unlike many of today's commentators, he understands that what has happened is more important than what might happen. Thus, when Ryan Spilborghs came up to bat in the first inning, Mr. Scully said: "Rockies with runners at second and third. Torrealba, the butter-and-egg man, just delivered a double to drive in two runs. Wolf has made 30 pitches so far in the first inning and the Rockies lead two to nothing."


Mr. Scully didn't come out of the womb delivering such eloquent and informative commentary. He was tutored by legendary broadcaster Red Barber. In 1950, when he was only 23, Mr. Scully joined his mentor in the Brooklyn Dodgers broadcast booth and learned to never root for the home team, not to socialize with the ballplayers, not to listen to other broadcasters, and to know when to shut up. "Sometimes, nothing says it better than the roar of the crowd," Mr. Scully said.


Although he spent just four years at Mr. Barber's elbow, they were formative years. "In many ways, I was the son he never had," Mr. Scully recalled fondly.


In 1954, Mr. Scully became the sole Dodgers broadcaster. When the team moved to L.A. in 1958, the native New Yorker went with them. It was in Los Angeles that he forever put his imprint on this team and this city.
Mr. Scully credits the transistor radio with his early popularity. In fact, fans from the era told me that so many people brought radios with them to the team's first West Coast home, the cavernous Los Angeles Coliseum, that broadcast engineers were vexed by feedback from Mr. Scully's own voice.


Ross Miller, a 55-year-old Los Angeles pediatrician and Dodgers season-ticket holder, was one of those fans who grew up with Mr. Scully in his ear. "What's amazing, what really speaks to Vinny's talent, is the fact that he was describing a game we were watching with our own eyes, yet his words painted the picture so much better." Indeed, sitting in the Dodgers press box, I found myself averting my eyes from the field, preferring to let Mr. Scully describe the action.


The broadcaster insists that he never comes to the ballpark with any prepared lines, which makes some of his legendary calls all the more remarkable. In 1956, when Don Larsen went into the last inning of the only perfect game in World Series history, Mr. Scully said: "Let's all take a deep breath as we go to the most dramatic ninth inning in the history of baseball." In 1974, when Hank Aaron stepped to the plate to break Babe Ruth's home run record, Mr. Scully noted: "A black man is getting a standing ovation in the Deep South for breaking a record of an all-time baseball idol." In 1988, when Kirk Gibson hit a walk-off home run to win the first game of the World Series, the broadcaster said: "In a year that has been so improbable, the impossible has happened."


But perhaps his greatest call of all time came during Sandy Koufax's perfect game: "Three times in his sensational career has Sandy Koufax walked out to the mound to pitch a fateful ninth where he turned in a no-hitter. But tonight, September the ninth, nineteen-hundred and sixty-five, he made the toughest walk of his career, I'm sure, because through eight innings he has pitched a perfect game."


Later in the inning, he said, "there's twenty-nine thousand people in the ballpark and a million butterflies." And when Mr. Koufax struck out Harvey Kuenn to end the game, Mr. Scully simply said, "Swung on and missed, a perfect game," then let the crowd speak for 38 seconds. I can't imagine a broadcaster today shutting up for three seconds, much less 38.


The Dodgers host the Cardinals tonight to start the National League Division Series. The game will be broadcast nationally using the latest high-definition television technology. But I'd argue that the clearest picture of the game will come via radio and, as has been the case for the past six decades, it will come from Mr. Scully.


—Mr. Yost is a writer in Chicago.

Monday, October 12, 2009

Living and Dying By the Sword


Not this time for World Series Hero Jon Papelbon
Francona and Tracy: Live and Die by the Sword
by Norm Kent
Terry Francona is a World Series winner.

Jim Tracy took the Rockies to the mountaintop this season.

Both managers were on the verge of elimination in a key playoff game in the Division Series.

Each team, down at home in the bottom of the 8th, rose to the occasion and saw their team take the lead.

How does not matter, really, does it? Bottom line is that home in the cold Yorvit Torrealba, Mr. Rocktober, drove a shot to the wall that gave the Rockies a 4-2 lead in the bottom of the 8th inning of a decisive game, which led to Tracy handing the ball to Huston Street in the 9th. Huston, 35 of 37 saves, Street. Game in the bag?

At Fenway, a few days before, a similar scene. Faced with elimination and extinction, the Sox rise from the ashes in the home 8th. They go to the 9th and Papelbon is on the mound to protect a two run lead. Game in the bag?

In both instances, one thinks of course. But this is October. This is the playoffs. And this is never say die for all the money. And these are guys who know no defeat. Who will not quit. Who will not yield.

Not even with two strikes two outs and the game on the line in 25 degree Colorado cold. Then Rollins singles. Utley walks. Howard ropes a rocket off the wall. And Werth follows with a game breaker, all off Street.

Two days before, Paps on the mound. Two outs. Two strikes, a pitch away from victory. Aybar slaps one to center. Figgins works a 3-2 pitch walk. Abreu raps it off the left field wall. Hunter is walked. Guerrero lines a game winner to center, all off Paps.

And I am thinking, watching both games, how both closers were off the mark, struggling, not finding home plate. Both outside and high on close pitches they needed to win. As a fan, you said: "God, get that guy out of the game. He is blowing it." But I am the fan and the manager has his guy on the mound and he shall not be moved.
But you got the feeling they were not going to get the last out; that the Angels were too good to be denied, and the Phils were defending World Champs for a reason. What a lineup. Rollins, Victorino, Utley, Howard, Ibanez, and Werth. Not an easy out anywhere. No reason to give up. And Street was clearly on the wrong intersection. Paps was wild high.

The Angelos started their year with their entire pitching staff on the DL, and one dies in an auto accident. On July 4, they lose Guerrero, Hunter, and Rivera for a month and proceed to win 18 of 20. These teams were just not going to lose. And they did not.

Ironically, in each instance, Francona and Tracy did not budge. They did not remove their ace reliever, though the options were many in the bullpen. Guys like Okajima or Marquis. Loyalty to a fault? What do you think?
Both defeats saw the home team lose leads in the top of the ninth and fail to come back in the bottom half. Both defeats saw crowds lifted into 8th inning ecstasy only to be doomed by 9th inning agony. Only to see their ace closers aced.

Of this, baseball legends and stories are made. Monday morning quarterbacking? Of course. Why not? On the subway home, I am sure that is what all the Rockies fans and Red Sox fans were thinking.
Why did we not make the switch? This was not 2007 anymore. This was a new year. Move with the tide. The managers did not, and the waters sucked them underneath. The Rockies and Red Sox went down to defeat, and so it goes. So it goes.
Back to the Division series. Will the Phils top LA again, to go back to the World Series? Will the Yanks make their first season at their new stadium a World Series endeavor? Can they top the Angels who seem to jinx them? Will their be a first ever Angels-Dodgers crosstown World Series?
Lots of questions, no answers, just some fun baseball ahead.
2002 WS Champs Angels vs 2000 WS Champs Yankees
2008 WS Champs Phillies vs wow its been awhile Dodgers

Thursday, October 8, 2009

12 Year Old Homers Off Howard




Well this story sure has generated controversy but there is no doubt in my mind that young Jennifer got wrongfully taken by the Phillies and the result is just and correct and proper. I will comment some more later, but for now interviews with CNN, NPR, and a few others are taking up the day.

Fantasy Furor: Did I Do Wrong or Right


The issue today is whether by doing right by me I did wrong by my league.

Here goes.

Pissing Off Your League's Owners

Did I do the right thing, that is the question....

There are 20 teams in a daily league where the stats come down to the last day, the last inning, the last at bat.

Four teams are fighting for second to fifth place.

Myself, I am in a five way battle to finish between seventh and eleventh place.

For the first five teams, their whip is at 1.34 and CBS Sports can only find a winner by carrying it out to not a hundredth of a point, but a thousandth. The winner could be by 1.345 to 1.347 to 1.348. Thus, a walk, a hit, a bunt single can shift the standings. Can decide who gets $500 for finishing second, or $50 for finishing fifth.

That is how tight the league is. My race is over. I am going to finish 8th, 9th or 10th, out of the money. The others can win or lose hundreds of bucks, depending on how some of my players perform in the one game playoff between Minny and Motown. A SB there, a HR here, can move other teams final stats.

The season ends and after a really bad week, I drop from 7th to 9th by a half point. I want to stay there. In the one game playoff, the only guy I have starting is Orlando Cabrera. I would just as soon not play him as add him into a roster, and use his stats, because there is a league loophole I want to take advantage of.

After the season ends, you cannot add or drop. But you can have up to five disabled players. So those teams that have extra disabled players on their team get to keep them and carry them into the offseason, giving them extra players to trade and deal. I do not.


But since the one game playoff for the title counts towards the standings, you can still add and drop players. However, if your lineup is not legal, the league rule is you get no stats for the day. So obviously no one wants illegal lineups. But what have I got to lose from just one player on one day? If I can pick up three rookie prospects for the entire offseason if I do not drop anyone, I would rather be illegal for one day since I am losing the at bats from one sole player. And yet I snare three rookies to deal or reserve, who may or may not pan out.

I could care less about the stats for that day. Again, all I have to sacrifice is the stats from O Cab. He is the only guy I have playing that day, and I would rather have an illegal lineup but pick up three guys to hold over the winter and see how they do in the spring.

The teams from second to fifth are livid. Some other owners too. They say I am altering the league results by having an illegal lineup. They are insisting I make O Cab active and my lineup legit arguing my greed is changing the end results of the league. What if O Cab goes 0 for 4 and I don’t use him, that stat could push me down a fraction in b.a., and that could change the final standings by a thousandth of a point for the third place team. So I should play the guy, everyone argues. And give up my three extra players. I say Why?

I thought I was playing for my team, not others. Should I care how the others finish? Some of these guys are calling me every name in the book and I did not really want to hurt anyone. I just wanted to help myself.

Do I have an obligation to play with a legal lineup when only one or two players is affected? I mean, I could reserve them to begin with.


The point is am I under an obligation to abide by a legal lineup? I am getting penalized for not doing so; I am losing stats for a day. But really, since it is only one player, why should I care? Does my decision impact the others, or the final standings? Who is to say? The league policy does frown on illegal lineups, but on this the last day of the season, isn't it worth the sanction to score the extra players?

Why are the other owners so angry? Do they have a right to be? Am I being unfair to the integrity of the league? It is a competition. I don't want to risk losing the place I am in or the extra players I am socking away

Would you ? Do you think I have a greater moral duty to the league?

You make the call. I chose to keep the players and have an illegal lineup, doing what was right for me and not what others say was good for the league. I don't think it mattered either way, but was I right? Was I wrong?


Was I being unfair to others by being too fair to myself?

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Barmes' Catch Lifts Rockies



If you haven't seen it yet, Clint Barmes' catch Sunday afternoon seemed to be one of those things that makes September baseball great. It was a fantastic catch that preserved a slim lead, keeping the Rockies 2 1/2 games up in the NL wild-card race and preventing the Dodgers from clinching the NL West. The play came at such a dramatic juncture that T.J. Simers' column in the Los Angeles Times hinges on it.

The only problem is that Barmes may not have actually caught the ball. On The Denver Post's Rockies blog today, Nick Groke publishes a picture taken by a Post photographer which shows the ball popping out of Barmes' glove as the second baseman falls to the ground and another picture which makes it appear as if the ball is on the ground.

Watching the replay closely, it's almost impossible to tell if Barmes holds on to the ball or if he scoops it off the ground in one motion as he rolls over. I haven't seen a better angle replay, though if one exists I doubt the Rockies or Major League Baseball would be all that eager to let the public see it. Well, with the Braves losing to the Marlins on Wednesday, and Ianetta launching a late inning HR last nite, it looks like the Rockies are back in the playoffs anyway. Not bad for a team that everyone thought was a one trick pony in 2007.

How could Clint Hurdle have been so bad this year and Jim Tracy so good? Whatever, Tracy now will go against his old team, the Dodgers, in the playoffs.